The LinkedIn Easy Apply Paradox: How Convenience Can Hinder Hiring

LinkedIn Easy Apply Scenario

Imagine this: You’re a recruiter, starting your morning ready to tackle the week’s hiring needs. You open your Applicant Tracking System (ATS) and are immediately met with a tidal wave of applications – hundreds, maybe even thousands – all thanks to LinkedIn’s Easy Apply feature. While the initial surge might seem promising, a closer look reveals that 70% to 90% of the applicants are not a good fit.

Some are mass applying to anything and everything, and some are AI bots, which causes qualified candidates to get lost in the sea of unqualified applications. With this trend on the rise, a critical question emerges: Does LinkedIn Easy Apply, despite its convenience, make it harder to hire the best talent?

Pros of LinkedIn Easy Apply

LinkedIn Easy Apply was designed to streamline the application process, offering a quick and effortless way for candidates to apply to open roles. For job seekers, it’s undeniably appealing. With just a few clicks, they can submit their profile to countless positions, maximizing their reach and potentially landing more interviews. The speed and simplicity are undeniable, and the potential for increased application volume is a clear draw.

From a recruiter’s perspective, Easy Apply appears to offer a similar advantage – a potentially larger pool of applicants and the illusion of time saved in the initial screening.

However, this perceived efficiency often proves to be a mirage.

Cons of LinkedIn Easy Apply

Quality vs Quantity

The dilemma revolves around the trade-off between quantity and quality. Easy Apply drastically lowers the barrier to entry for job seekers, resulting in a flood of applications, many of which are irrelevant.

Recruiters are then faced with the daunting task of sifting through hundreds of resumes, wasting valuable time that could be spent on more strategic activities. Identifying qualified candidates in the flood of LinkedIn Easy Apply applicants is like finding a needle in a haystack, a frustrating and inefficient process.

Lowers Candidate Engagement

Beyond the sheer volume, Easy Apply can also create a disconnect between candidates and companies. The lack of personalized interaction in the quick application process can lead to passive applications, where candidates haven’t fully considered the role or the company. This lack of engagement can translate to lower candidate interest, reduced engagement rates, and a longer time-to-hire.

Reduces Candidate Quality

Furthermore, Easy Apply often bypasses traditional screening methods, such as cover letters and targeted application questions. While sometimes considered cumbersome, this additional information can be vital in assessing candidate fit beyond just skills and keywords. They offer insights into a candidate’s motivations, communication style, and cultural alignment – crucial factors that can make or break a successful hire. By relying solely on resumes, recruiters risk overlooking potentially great candidates who may not perfectly match specific keywords but possess valuable transferable skills and a strong work ethic.

Candidate Overload

Finally, the sheer volume of applications generated by Easy Apply can put a significant strain on Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS). Overloaded ATS systems can experience slowdowns, crashes, and delays in processing applications, further delaying the efficiency of the hiring process. Let alone the additional workload for recruiters to review and screen the surplus of applicants.

How to Avoid the LinkedIn Easy Apply Black Hole?

Head of Talent at Matter Labs, Luke Eaton, said it best – “LinkedIn gave you EasyApply for free, flooded your ATS with unmanageable volume, and now they’re selling you AI-powered search and filtering to fix the very problem they created.”

So, what can recruiters do to navigate the Easy Apply paradox and improve their hiring outcomes? The key is to adopt a more strategic and balanced approach.

Consider reserving LinkedIn Easy Apply for specific roles, such as entry-level positions or high-volume hiring initiatives, where a large pool of applicants is preferred. Supplementing Easy Apply with other application methods is crucial for more specialized or senior roles.

Ultimately, the most effective strategy is to shift the focus from quantity to quality.

Prioritizing quality candidates over a large pool of applications requires a more proactive and targeted approach, including actively engaging passive candidates, building a strong employer brand that attracts top talent, and leveraging data-driven insights to refine the hiring process.

Sourcing Strategically with Outcome-Driven Recruiting Solutions

Leoforce’s Outcome-Based Solutions have become a real game changer for talent acquisition teams. The pay-per-performance solutions combine AI speed with human insight expertise to provide better, faster hiring outcomes.

Cut through the noise with Leoforce’s solutions that source and engage ready-to-talk top talent for you so that all your team has to worry about is hiring them. With this innovative approach, you can improve the time, cost, and quality of hires.

Learn more about Leoforce’s  Outcome-Based Solutions.

While LinkedIn Easy Apply offers undeniable convenience, ultimately the feature presents a range of challenges that can slow down the hiring process. By understanding these hurdles and adopting a more strategic approach, recruiters can enhance efficiency and results.

It’s time to rethink the Easy Apply strategy and prioritize quality over quantity to ensure that the ease of application doesn’t come at the cost of hiring the best talent.